JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 15, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Manuel Martinez Jaimes Vs. Telecom En Liquidacion

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Septimo Civil Del Circuito De Cucuta Y El Juzgado Treinta Y Tres Civil Del Circuito De Bogota D.C. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Septimo Civil Del Circuito De Cucuta
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Telecom En Liquidacion
  • Competencia de juez civil del circuito
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional aun cuando hubiere o no superior jerárquico común
Accion De Tutela Contra Entidades Descentralizadas Por Servicios Del Orden Nacional
  • Conocimiento por jueces de circuito o con categoría de tales en primera instancia
Acción De Tutela
  • Competencia por razón del territorio según artículo 37 del Decreto 2591 de 1991
  • Criterios para establecer la competencia del juez del lugar donde ocurrió la vulneración o amenaza de los derechos fundamentales
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por el ciudadano Manuel Martinez Jaimes en contra de la Empresa Nacional de Telecomunicaciones -TELECOM- en liquidacion, al Juzgado
  2. Septimo. Civil del Circuito de Cucuta, para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.